This is a query that a lot of candidates have. You have held anywhere between 0 and 100 jobs in the last 10 years. You need the hiring manager to see how expert and qualified you are for the post, so you are eager to list every single job experience you have held to demonstrate the interviewer that you are a work experience machine.
Quality over Quantity
This is not the worth mentioned strategy. In fact, it is the worst planning strategy. Interviewers have all of thirty seconds or less to look at your resume before choosing if you are someone they need to seriously think. When they analyze that large a resume, one of three things is bound to appear:
- The interviewer will not bother looking at anything other than the 1st page.
- The interviewer will spend less time observing at your more latest and recent jobs in the interest of time.
- The interviewer will skim around, missing significant points.
No matter what ever happens, your chance of getting the job suffers. You have a restricted rate of time to draw the interests of the employer. The best way to do that is to have your best data be the only data available to the employer.
The Interviewer Does not Care
The reality is that the interviewer really does not give a damn about the crappy job you had ten years ago. Maybe you consider the activities were relevant, but if you have not done them recently, the interviewer is going to doubt that you still have any of the qualities.
Similarly, if you held a lot of jobs in a short span of time, the interviewer is not going to care about any job you held for a very small span of time, nor are they going to consider highly of you for bouncing nearly from job to job.
Whenever you write your resume, it is significant to inquire yourself: Does the interviewer care?
Take Away Tips
- Always select quality over quantity.
- Eliminate any jobs that do not help you get the job.