It can be very difficult for persons to make decisions based on multiple pieces of data. It is like politics – most persons merely look for a quick answer, and do not bother observing anything else unless it matches their world view.

Interviewers need to know that you have the awareness essential to look at multiple pieces of data at once, and that you can observe that information and turn it into a wise, thoughtful outcome.

Behavioral Interview Query: Explain a project where you have had to observe information from multiple sources on case to make a decision. What approach did you take? What was the result?

However, this is an analytical interview query, it is one with a wide range of answers. You simply require being capable to show that you are someone that looks for more information to come up with an answer– someone that does more than merely take what they are told to do and do it without considering about and looking for other choices. You can talk about:

• Multiple places of research on a topic which you then utilized to help you decide on the best decision.
• A decision you made when various persons told you to take a variety of many actions.
• Something you did to solve an issue when more than one source gave distinctive stories.

You can talk about an issue you helped solve, or a solution you got to deployed on observing multiple sources. There are many different ways to approach this query, and as long as you are analytical in your decision making procedure, you will impress the interviewer.

Sample Answer

“I have a great instance of this, really. When I was handling the sales department at Company X we were thinking which member of the sales team to promote to sales lead. I did not need to make a biased decision, because even though I had my own choices and preferences, I also knew that the post was too significant for it to be based on only my own judgment.

I ran what is known as a 360 degree survey on entire my staff. I sent out evaluation surveys to anyone the sales group had worked with – clients, other staff members, Ex-staff members – everyone. Then I took all of that information, and utilized the information to determine which 2 staff members made the most sense deployed on what the information told me, not what I felt about each worker.

One was a surprise, the other I hoped. I arranged individual interviews with both of them, concentrating on the role itself, and ultimately made the hire. The sales staff is doing very well under her leadership, so I consider that I made the right choice.”

For your own response, try to recall instances where 2 or 3 workers told you different things, or when you had to do much research yourself and noticed that there were conflicting concepts. Remember, this is an analytical interview query, which means you want to indicate that you put thought and fact into the decision. The mere way to do that efficiently is if you can show that the decision was not obvious, and you had to utilize your mind to solve for the solution.