Considered theories features one of the first attempts that have emerged in the individual entrance framework to explain the phenomenon of leadership, and the detection of the common features of the leaders of the successful, and if the studies conducted by the supporters of this theory has begun on a small scale at the beginning of this century, it has expanded and become more inclusive after World War second ((F. Fiedler, 1967 )
The theory is that an individual who owns a set of personal characteristics, such as intelligence and savvy and packages and the ability to cooperate and enthusiasm, courage and proactive and set a good example, linguistic, appreciation and responsibility, achievement and the ability and skill to adapt is a leader, where it is often these features are deeply rooted in the same can not be gained in a short period of training and preparation, usually personality traits are affected by the prevailing culture in the community pattern, and adopted the owners of this theory to observe a number of recognized leaders, users way deductive, through which they were able to devise leadership traits that found common in these leaders, and came out of it that these common features is the attributes necessary for leadership.

Therefore classified attributes commander to:

• A #. Physical features:

the leaders tend to height and heavy weight high and mental health.

• B #. Emotional traits:

the leaders tend to extroversion, and sense of humor and fun, and to encourage the spirit of cooperation, and taking into account the feelings of others, and are more tolerant and courtesy and balanced.

• T #. Mental traits:

the leaders, smarter, and with high culture, knowledge and a broader horizon and Ooo Kdr to predict events.
Was much criticized the theory of features, including: the difficulty of the availability of all the features listed in one person, in addition to the different researchers in identifying leadership traits, and not to determine the characteristics that distinguish leaders from followers, as well as the theory did not indicate the relative importance of different attributes to influence the leader and his success. (Blind 0.2005: 264)

Other drawbacks to this theory:

A #. Lack of agreement on the meaning of each unified leadership trait and difficulty disseminate the results of this theory in a scientific constant. (Sheikh Salem et al. 1998).
B #. Many of the features that I suppose supporters of the theory of personality traits that they do not exist only in the leaders may be available in the leaders and non-leaders, which can not be with him to recognize that the availability of the personal characteristics of leadership in someone necessarily make him a successful leader.
T #. There is no agreement between the supporters of the theory on a limited set of features, and how they can check the availability of this feature in the personal, and finally when this will be an innate characteristic and when to be acquired and can be learned. (Canaan, 1985, p. 312)
W #. May not be available in the Commander feature one or more of the agreed-upon feature, however it is to succeed in his leadership